In 1986, the General Assembly approved an amendment that prohibited the taking of deer with dogs in certain parts of Richmond County. In 1995 that rule was expanded to include other areas of the county.
Monday night Tom Carr, a resident of Richmond County, spoke to the board about the problem.
Carr’s situation is that the law can’t protect enough landowners. He has been effected by trespassing of individuals who need to get their animals and deer have been shot on his property.
“It’s not just me, other individuals have had similar situations,” Carr said.
Bill Webb has had to take time to help hunters get their dogs of whom he didn’t authorize to be there in the first place.
“I’ve had my quail hunting interrupted by deer hunters,” Webb said. “Wouldn’t it be neat if we take a negative thing like this and turn it into a positive.”
Webb is looking at being able to set the regulations, and let the deer hunters pay for hunting. That will bring money to Richmond County, in the form of hunting preserves.
“I’d like for a group of hunters to implement a county wide regulation for the taking of buck deer,” Webb said.
Richmond County Sheriff Dale Furr agrees there is a problem.
“These people don’t mean to trespass but they have no choice. A lot of the hunters don’t live in Richmond County and they don’t care about destroying property.”
The board was in favor of talking about extending the area where deer hunting with dogs is prohibited. The next meeting is June 7 at 6:30 p.m. in the Richmond County Administrative Office Building.
In other action:
n The Board of Commissioners have been asked to consider an agreement with Plastek to match a One North Carolina Grant. The match would be through Richmond County’s Property Tax Grant Program. This would provide a 60 percent annual grant for five years. Depending on the investment the grant could be as high as $462,000. This incentive will allow the creation of 250 jobs with the company, and all were in favor of the idea.
“Without the support of the governor and the board of commissioners, it would not have been possible,” said County Manager Rick Sago.
Plastek has also asked the board of commissioners to hold a public hearing to let the citizens of Richmond County know about their intention to apply for up to $750,000 or half of a $1.5 million grant to rehab the building they purchased. The grant must be applied for by the local government then reimbursed to the company. Richmond County will not have any money in the program and the grant must be made by the company in a 50 percent split. No one opposed the request and the issue will be addressed at the next meeting.
A public hearing was held on a petition to make Northside Fire Department in charge of fire protection services for a portion of Fox Road. The residents in the area are under the Hamlet jurisdiction but is more than seven miles away. The closer station is Northside at about three miles.
Russ Wilson, a resident of Fox Road, would like this change to take effect. The 66 percent of people that needed to sign the petition did and they have agreed to pay the taxes required.
“A few years ago, I had some neighbors in the Hamlet district that had a fire. They called the Hamlet Fire Department and had to wait 30 minutes for them to arrive, and Northside Fire Department and Hoffman Fire Department couldn’t do anything until the HFD arrived.”
This item was not opposed.
In other action:
Planning Director Jamie Armstrong gave updates on the planning board and geographic information systems.
A contractor started on April 30 on the removal of the old Safie Mill. The large tower, a smoke stack pillar and the wall dividing the two tracts are remaining, Armstrong said.
“Residents are complaining about not being able to breath, smoke in their home and having severe problems,” Commissioner Pam Dillman said.
The demolition must be done by July 30.
Sago, reported on the most recent projects and provide an update on the economic development activities.
Progress Energy has invited the commissioners to a tour of its new powerplant on May 25. The Fox Road water line meeting will be Friday.
Newly appointed Chief Executive Office Victoria Whitt for Sandhills for Mental Health discussed the quarterly report and the fiscal year 2010-2011 request.
“We are not asking for an increase it funds,” Whitt said.
The Sandhills Center has not requested an increase in county general funding in the past six years. No one opposed this request. She took over in November, and was offered the full time position in February.
A resident has requested the renaming of a section of road their home faces, the road off Trevor Andrews. The petitioner had obtained 100 percent of the required signatures. They now want the road to be called Butch Sinclair Drive. All were in favor of this request but will be ruled in the next meeting.
The Richmond County Humane Society made a request to increase their vaccination fee for rabies from $6 to $8. This request was approved by the Richmond County board of health at their April 8 meeting. No one opposed this request.
A request was made for board approval of the Juvenile Crime Prevention Council City Plan. It is requesting $167,331 of program funding. The local county matching funds are budgeted through non departmental contributions. This will be discussed in the next meeting.
A request for the board to authorize advertisement for public hearing on proposed budget for fiscal year 2010-2011. The board may wish to set the public hearing date on the next schedule meeting.
The board approved a proclamation to designate Saturday at Peace Officers Memorial Day, and this whole week as National Police Week. The board also approved the proclamation designating May as Older Americans Month.
Hollie Nivens can be reached at (910) 997-3111 ext. 19 or by e-mailing at hnivens@yourdailyjournal.com.







you may have misspoken, but there's alot more out there that actually feel that way. It seems that your "anger" stems against those that are trespassing and destroying your property. Why is it that you can't/won't catch them and prosecute them for BREAKING THE LAW? I have ZERO tolerance for that kind of behavior from doghunters or still hunters alike. But coming on here and calling for an all out ban for all doghunting because you won't take the necessary steps to catch the ones that are trespassing and vandalizing your property is ridiculous. Stop running people off and start prosecuting them. Law enforcement, both sherriff and gamewarden, can and will put a stop to that kind of behavior. If you can't get them to assist you then go over their heads, but don't come on here and group all doghunters into the same group and cry for a ban of our sport. As I said before I respect the property owners I hunt around and if I saw someone trespassing and destroying personal property you bet your butt I'd turn them in.
I mispoke about my deer on my land in anger. I know that I do not "own" the deer. I would be happy if any of my neighbors or their kids killed a nice buck at any time. No, I don't have cameras out to know what deer I have and how many. What i do know is that when property is clearly marked NO TRESSPASSING, I shouldn't have to worry about dogs coming through and disturbing a still hunt. I also shouldn't have to worry about replacing locks that have been cut or running people off of my property when it is clearly marked NO TRESSPASSING. What is boils down to basiclly is respecting the property of others. I know that a few bad apples can ruin a good thing for everyone. I aslo know a lot of people that dog hunt and that do it by the book. Why should I have to get a grip, I've done nothing wrong other that say that they are my deer. I understand that you are upset though, shooting off your moth because you are mad, I guess i would be mad too if my favorite pastime was getting taken. Maybe you can learn to Kayak or play the piano.
BB
That sentiment is EXACTLY where the problem lies. First off, they aren't YOUR deer. They belong to the state. I bet you are one of those that gets all upset if a neighbor shoots a buck you've been watching because you thought he was "yours". Get a grip man.
Secondly if you have problems with people trespassing as much as you say you do, catch them and prosecute them, because that's ALREADY against the law. Oh and I've seen my share of bird dogs get a pretty good ways away and even seen a few that would chase a deer so they can and do get away from their owners. There's bad apples on both sides of the tree. Still hunters trespass just as much as doghunters, don't get me started on the ones that drive down the road and shoot out of their windows or shoot at the bushes shaking in the woods. You have a right to hunt your land the way you want to, I respect that. If you have problems with people trespassing on your land, catch them and prosecute them to the fullest.
Sick of Dog Hunting
pouisblong