Fatcow Icon
Election 2010: Candidates for School Board
Apr 23, 2010 | 1148 views | 7 7 comments | 15 15 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Incumbents

Pam Easterling

ADDRESS: 224 Black Jack Drive, Rockingham

EDUCATION: 1975 graduate of Richmond Senior High School; Associate Degree in Human Resources Technology; a Bachelor of Science Degree in Sociology; and a Masters Degree in Public Administration.

FAMILY: husband, Walter, and two daughters, Alissa and Katie; son-in-law, Todd Scott; and two grandchildren, Hailey and Ella.

I am Pam Easterling and I am seeking re-election to the Board of Education. I am a life-long resident of Richmond County and continue to live in Rockingham. If re-elected, I will continue to support a curriculum designed for 21st Century learning. This includes a differentiated curriculum that is adaptive for children from a variety of circumstances, learning capabilities and learning styles.

I will ensure we continue to make use of the most refined and workable approaches such as teams that enable the teachers to fully employ their skills. I will continue to support proven means of parental and family involvement and continue to invite community resources into the schools to work with teachers in assisting each student.

Most of these approaches are non-traditional but have been implemented for some time requiring full community support and commitment. I might add these approaches are all less expensive and more productive for the community.

By continuing to support 21st century learning styles, we ensure each student is prepared to face the challenges that lie ahead in becoming and remaining successful in a globally competitive workforce.

Ed Ormsby

ADDRESS: 620 Anson Ave., Rockingham

EDUCATION: I am a graduate of Campbell University with a degree in Biology and Science education. I was granted my North Carolina Teaching Certificate in science in 1967. Later, I received my Masters Degree in Educational Administration from UNC at Greensboro followed by the Advanced Post Graduate Study, Sixth Year Degree, from UNC at Charlotte. I held my license at the masters and advance level in seven areas including Gifted and Talented Teacher, Science Education Teacher, Curriculum Specialist, Vocational Education Director, Exceptional Children’s Director, Principal and Superintendent.

FAMILY: I am married to Bobbie Sue Ormsby. We have four children, all of which graduated from Richmond Senior High School and college. They are Britt Lovin, Brad Lovin, Don Ormsby and Laura Lovin Swangim. Laura is an elementary teacher in Arden, N.C.

EXPERIENCE: I have work experience at each of the areas for which I was licensed. In Richmond County, I have served as a teacher at Hamlet High School and Richmond Senior High. I have been an assistant principal at Fairview Heights Elementary School, and as a principal at Roberdell Children’s Center, Ellerbe Junior High and Monroe Avenue Elementary School. I retired from Monroe Avenue with 34 years of service.

MILITARY SERVICE: I am a graduate of the N.C. Non-Commissioned Officer Military Academy at Fort Bragg, N.C. and completed six years service with the Army National Guard as a wheeled vehicle mechanic and as a ground surveillance radar operator with the rank of sergeant.

CIVIC EXPERIENCE: I have been active in community service as a member and past deacon at First Baptist Church of Rockingham and member and past chair of the Cameron Morrison Prison Community Resource Council. I hold membership on the Richmond County Schools Educational Foundation Board and the Career and Technical Education Advisory Council. I am, also, a member of the Rockingham Civitan Club, The Rockingham Masonic Lodge, and the Community Based Alternatives Board.

The Richmond County Board of Education can best make academic achievement accessible to all students by having a great teacher in front of every Richmond County classroom and by providing them with the necessary resources and support. In order for teaching to be both effective and efficient, we must manage performance by setting clear expectations and holding ourselves accountable for meeting them.

Thomas McInnis

ADDRESS: 800 Haywood Parker Road, Ellerbe

EDUCATION: graduate of Ellerbe High School

FAMILY: Includes a married daughter who lives in Richmond County and nephew Dale McInnis who is the president of Richmond Community College.

As I look into the future of public education in our county, I see our school board continuing to add new and innovative programs that challenge our students to embrace the educational process. In order to make academic achievement more accessible, we must continue to create schools and classes that will address the unique needs of all students. We can no longer teach using a “one size fits all” approach that does not connect with the diversity of 21st Century students. Our Early College High School on the campus of Richmond Community College is a prime example of meeting the educational needs of a unique student population. Students at the early college are being given the chance of a college degree while working on their high school diploma. This group of students might not have had a chance at a college education had this program not been available.

Our Transitional School is another educational offering that is providing at risk students with intensive remediation through smaller classes and is giving them the opportunity to graduate on task and on time. Leak Street High School offers yet another opportunity for student success. To date, this school has changed the lives of many of our students whose pathway might not have been so bright. The implementation and success of these non-traditional schools has proven that every student has a place where their full potential can be attained. In order for us to continue on this path of higher achievement, we must continue to assess the needs of all students and implement the types experiences that students see as relevant for their future.

Unfortunately, we will be delayed in many of the cutting edge educational opportunities that we would like to offer because of the current budget crisis. Nevertheless, we are thankful that while many large districts are cutting jobs we have been able to stay the course due to wise financial management.

In closing, if there is one sentence that will answer the question asked, it would be as follows: “By assessing student needs and meeting those needs using innovative educational programs, the most modern technology available, the best teachers in North Carolina, in modern and safe facilities, every student in Richmond County Schools will have accessibly to academic achievement.”

Challengers

Irene Pittman Aiken

ADDRESS: 821 Williamsburg Drive, Rockingham

EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: Ph.D. Curriculum & Instruction, Sociology minor,

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; M.A. Elementary Education

Pembroke State University (Now University of North Carolina at Pembroke);

B.A. Intermediate Education, Mathematics Concentration, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

EDUCATION EXPERIENCE: Associate Dean, School of Graduate Studies, University of North Carolina at Pembroke; Professor, School of Education, University of North Carolina at Pembroke; Elected Vice President of Delta Kappa Gamma Educational Society; Counselor, Kappa Delta Pi, Education Honor Society; L.J. Bell PTA

The board can make academic achievement more accessible by removing unnecessary requirements and redundancies. The board can examine the report requirements, for example, and eliminate those that take classroom time (or teacher effort) away from concentration on fundamental reading, etc. We need to continue to assess what is working and purge what is not, focusing on student achievement. The school board functions not to run the schools but to help the schools run effectively and efficiently. My platform is Focus Education and I believe my Focus Education will help the school board do its job and result in increased student achievement.

Inside the classroom, I want to continue our focus on the academic achievement of our students. We must improve the fundamental reading, writing and math skills of our community, beginning with our children. The less prosperous counties in the state have the highest concentrations of illiteracy, but Richmond County can be the exception to the rule.

We need to focus our energies to enable every Richmond County student to work up to the level of his or her ability, not just the minimum mandated standards. Performing at the basic level is underperforming for many of our children and the minimum standards will not result in the successful students we desire.

I advocate Focus Education for our entire county. Education should be the topic of conversation just like the Super Bowl or the price of gas. A focus on education means increased volunteerism in and for the schools. Many businesses permit employees to spend time (such as two hours per week) volunteering in the schools. Such volunteerism can become a mainstream practice, a part of the everyday life of Richmond County businesses. Volunteers could assist parents as well as students, such as in translating and clarifying information for non-English speaking parents, or working with parents who themselves need basic skills. A countywide focus on education will require enhanced communication between the schools and the community, and a sharing of successes as well as needs.

We are fortunate to have competent and caring teachers in Richmond County. We need to examine our priorities and make sure our teachers have the support and appreciation they need to perform optimally in the classroom. Richmond County can become known statewide for its quality schools and for the support the community provides them. In these ways, I believe we will increase the academic achievement of our students.



Joe Richardson

ADDRESS: 406 McDonald Church Road, Rockingham

EXPERIENCE: I have 35 years in education in Richmond County, working as a teacher, assistant principal, principal and assistant superintendent. I served on the board of directors and as president of the NC Association of School Administrators.

FAMILY: wife, Cathey, and have four children, all graduates of RSHS. Dann, Jennifer and husband Rick, Caroline and husband Fred, Lora Lea and husband Jeremy, and five grandchildren.

MILITARY SERVICE: I am a veteran, serving with the 82nd Airborne Division. A member of Post 47, American Legion.

In order to enhance academic achievement for all students the school board must work with the superintendent and his staff to bring about three things. 1. Improve student interest in learning. It is a hard thing to do, but if we can’t get them interested, we can’t go far. The board, with input from teachers and others needs to conduct an in depth study and ongoing dialogue to see where we are and what we can do to improve in this area.

2. Improve parental involvement. This is another hard thing to do, but it is imperative if we are to improve academic achievement for all students. Parent-Teacher conferences on specified days are good but the same parents generally make the effort and the ones who need the conference the most seldom show up. The school board needs to see that all schools have an active P.T.O. and board members should meet with parents at the schools to discuss the implementation of a program that will get parents involved. Some parents say they don’t feel welcome at school, some say they go to the school to listen and not be heard. There are 168 hours in a week. Teachers have 35 of those hours to make a major impact on student’s lives. Parents have them the other 133. That’s how important parental involvement happens to be.

3. Support and Appreciate teachers. I think the school board needs to be more pro-active in showing their support and appreciation for teachers and other staff members. The board should recognize an educator each month. Recognizing those responsible for improving student achievement will make them want to achieve even more. Good things are happening in classrooms everyday but we don’t hear about the person making it happen. Morale is important to student achievement.
Comments
(7)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
|
April 29, 2010
I’ve been reading these comments and decided to put my 2 cents worth into the mix. I have lived in this county my entire life. I went to school here and now I have children in school here. Over the past couple of years, I have seen more improvement in the school system than I have seen in a long, long time. My son was struggling and had given up. He ended up in the Transitional School and that has made all the difference for him. He’s doing great now. For that reason alone, I would like to see the current school board members remain in office. I would like to see what else they might come up with that will help the schools. That still leaves one open seat since Mrs. Wilson decided not to run. I don’t care whether Mr. Richardson gets that seat or Mrs. Aiken. I just hope that whoever gets it will work with the remaining board members to keep the ball rolling.
|
April 29, 2010
I would like to see what Mr. Richardson and Dr. Irene Pittman Aiken can bring to the board. As a new Richmond County Resident, I have no ties to any of the Candidates and wish each one the best of luck. The only thing I can't understand is why is Citizen28345 afraid of change, you said "Hopefully, when the dust clears on election day, we will have Aiken, McInnis, Easterling, and Ormsby on the Richmond County Board of Education". Why not vote out some incumbents and let some people with different views take a seatat the table? Who cares if they were part of a previous administration, was Mr. Richardson that powerful of a person to influence the whole administration? According to his profile he was an assistant superintendent not the superintendent! I feel that we should put in some new people and if for some reason they don't do a good job then the next time around vote them out! It's that simple.
|
April 27, 2010
I want to thank citizenCan for all the facts regarding the implementation of the early colleges, but there are a few details that were left out. While the two early colleges did open the same year, Scotland Early College was in the planning stage much earlier than Richmond though as citizenCAN so noted; both were invited into the program at the same time. We all know how important advance planning can be. Thankfully, Richmond Early College has been successful, but we should still question why the administration was so hesitant, waiting till the last minute to make a move. After all, the data was available to prove that the early college concept was successful in other parts of the state and country. Why not jump at the prospect of our small county having the same opportunities as others? Are we just too rural…too backwoods? I don’t think so!!! Oh wait…I forgot, an administration that kept us in a junior high system decades after the other counties in our state moved forward with the middle school concept wouldn’t dare think of moving quickly toward something like an early college. Actually, had we participated in advancing our school system toward those trends proven effective back in the 80’s…THE 80’s…then we would not have been in a situation where we had to deal with a realignment at this point in time. What took so long? I guess citizenCAN would say that this was nothing more than a quarter of a century of “thoroughly investigating the short-and long-term ramifications”, but I say that it was the inability of the past administrations, including the one of which Mr. Richardson was assistant superintendent, to commit to much needed change.

I just want to see advancement for our small county. I love this county. I love this school system and our students. Again, Mr. Richardson is a nice person, but he had his chance. It’s time to move on to a new day and thankfully a new administration with board members who will work together for the betterment of our children.

|
April 26, 2010
Interesting. You were “there at the time”? Where exactly were you? Inside the offices of the former administrators? You actually heard their discussions concerning the Early College concept? I would ask Citizen28345 to tread lightly when accusing people of being “scared to make a move” or having “no vision for the future”. I would also suggest that terms such as “forever” are highly misleading. So Scotland County started looking into the early college concept “much later than we did”, jumped on the idea, and had it going before Richmond County? It is my understanding that ALL North Carolina school systems were invited by the Department of Public Instruction to apply for a grant to begin the process of implementing an early college. They received the same information as Richmond County at the same time as Richmond County (and every county in the state). And contrary to Citizen28345’s contention, BOTH early colleges were implemented in 2007. I have pasted the following information from earlycolleges.org:

Richmond County Early College High School

Hamlet, NC

Year Opened: 2007

Postsecondary Partner: Richmond Community College

Intermediary: North Carolina New Schools Project

Scotland High School

Hamlet, NC

Year Opened: 2007

Postsecondary Partner: Richmond Community College

Intermediary: North Carolina New Schools Project

I invite the voters to verify this if they wish. There are currently 105 early college high schools in NC, with 9 new ones created just this year. Were we the first county to do this? No, but clearly, we are not the last and are years ahead of many schools. No vision for the future? Scared to make a move? Again, I would beg Citizen28345 to please not mislead the voters of this county with inaccuracies. I would also suggest that “jumping on an idea” without thoroughly investigating the short- and long-term ramifications is imprudent -- particularly in a low-wealth, rural county where resources are often limited.

Speaking of “jumping on an idea” – I would like to clarify one other issue that I feel is misleading to the voters of Richmond County. You state that Mr. Richardson, “…went against the realignment and made such a scene…” Again, I would ask that you double-check your facts before making erroneous statements. I was actually at the school board meeting that night, and I specifically recall Mr. Richardson stating, emphatically, that he was NOT against realignment; he WAS, however, disturbed by the clandestine and secretive way in which it was handled. His concern was the lack of input by the teachers and parents (the voters!). That meeting was covered by the Daily Journal, as all school board meetings are, and voters who wish to verify his statements can refer to the March 6, 2008 Richmond County Daily Journal, page 1, to see for themselves what he did and did not say. I assure you, he was not the only one who questioned the way in which the realignment was handled.

You also accuse Mr. Richardson of having no current “expertise” in curriculum. As a teacher, you should know that administrators, just like teachers, are required by NC to acquire on-going, continuing education in their fields. He retired 2 years ago – not 20 years ago! His expertise on curriculum is well known in education circles, and he has been asked to present his ideas at both state AND national administrative conferences.

Three decades of service to education he has no valuable insight to offer? Really??

Finally, please allow me to correct one more point. You imply that for years, the schools boards have been overrun by educators, and that Mr. McInnis brings a new, fresh business insight. I would suggest that the school board has always been represented with a variety of occupations, including business men and women. Yes – there have always been 2 or 3 educators. But I do not recall a board made up exclusively of educators. I cannot say with 100% certainty that there has NEVER been one, but I do not recall one. I am sure all educators respect the insight of others in the community, outside of the schools.

I do not wish to enter into a daily fray with Citizen28345, and I hope you do not feel I am trying to be antagonistic. You are certainly entitled to your opinions, just as I am. Just as you defend the candidates you prefer, I feel the need to defend the one I am sure would be an asset to Richmond County schools – again. You state that you do not know Mr. McInnis. I would contend that you really do not know Mr. Richardson. Anyone who does knows his greatest interest is helping the students and teachers of Richmond County. I do know he has several grandchildren in the school system. I seriously doubt he wants to prepare them for the 21st century with a 20th century education! Best wishes to you and your candidates.

|
April 26, 2010
I wonder why it took the past administration so long to address the Early College concept. As I recall and yes, I was there at the time, it took them forever to make a decision regarding the implementation of something new and different. They went back and forth…back and forth…scared to make a move, doubting that something like this would work. Scotland County Schools started looking into this idea much later than we did, and you know what, they actually jumped on the idea and had it going BEFORE we did. I was personally disgusted to see such highly educated men with no vision for the future.

As for Mr. Ormsby, he was not part of the central office administration and frankly, I think he has worked well with the current board. As I have watched the televised board meetings, I have seen a board that is working together and moving forward. I like that. As for Mr. McInnis, I don’t know the man, but I have certainly been impressed to see someone finally questioning the decisions that affect the tax dollars of Richmond County citizens. At least he doesn’t sit back and just accept what contractors and maintenance say as fact. I think that diversity on the board is something we have lacked for a long time. The norm for years was to vote in people who were affiliated with the school system, but school systems are big business! We now have a group of people that not only have knowledge about educational issues, but also people who have backgrounds in business and finance. This is a great thing!

So, you want my honest opinion about Mr. Richardson? Mr. Richardson was a great principal. He is a good man, but when he went against the realignment and made such a scene about the changes that we really did need, he proved to me that he wanted our school system to remain in the past. He proved to me that he just didn’t have a vision for the future of our schools. Perhaps my use of the term, “hidden agenda” was harsh. I really don’t think Mr. Richardson wants to do damage, I just don’t think he wants to move forward and based on things I’ve heard him say, I think he will not work well with the others on the board. Curriculum has changed drastically over the years. That might have been his expertise years ago, but that is not the case now. Dr. Aiken would definitely bring something new and fresh to the board in that regard. Mr. Richardson will not. He will bring the same old, same old. That’s just the way I see it.

Do I agree with all the decisions that were made by the board? No, but I am thrilled to see that we are finally attempting to do something different.

|
April 25, 2010
I am also a concerned citizen, as well as a teacher. I find it interesting that Citizen28345 accuses one of the candidates of having "...a hidden agenda and old ideas that didn't work back then." Let's address both parts of this statement.

I would be very interested to hear exactly what this hidden agenda might be. I find it more than a little unsportsman-like to accuse someone of "having a hidden agenda" without specifying what this agenda is. Not only is it unfair to the candidate, it is unfair to the voters of Richmond County to plant doubt as to a candidate's motives without substantiation. So what is this "hidden agenda"??

As to the "old ideas that didn't work back then..." -- Mr. McInnis gives the Early College High School as a "...prime example of meeting the educational needs of a unique student population." I would agree that it is an excellent program. While Mr. McInnis does not explicity claim responsibility for creating the Early College, I think he certainly implies it by claiming that, "...I see our school board continuing to add new and innovative programs...". He lists the Early College as a "prime example" of this. What Mr. McInnis does NOT state is that the Early College was created under the "PAST administration"!! The candidate Citizen28345 seems to be disparaging was instrumental in acquiring funding and establishing "our" Early College. This is a fact. It seems those "old ideas" might not be so archaic and useless after all.

Another issue that puzzles me: Citizen28345 endorses Mr. Ormsby for the schoolboard. Yet he retired after 34 years of service in Richmond County Schools. While I applaud his service to the children of this county, I wonder why he is not considered part of the "past administration" as well. He was a school administrator along with the candidate who seems to be in question. Does he have "old ideas" as well??

Finally, Citizen28345 does not name the candidate he/she is so critical of, but I have no problem naming him. It is probably obvious to every teacher in this county and probably every former student and many parents, that Citizen28345 is talking about Mr. Richardson. Was he part of the past administration? He certainly was. His years of experience make him immensely qualified and knowledgeable. And as a teacher, I have seen first-hand his dedication to the teachers and students of Richmond County. I would offer that anyone who wants to question Mr. Richardson's past decisions as an administrator or motives be specific, so that the record may be set straight when necessary. The voters of Richmond County deserve to hear the truth when making their decisions about who to entrust with our schools and our children. Innuendo and hollow accusations are insulting to the voters. I can't help but wonder who really DOES have a "hidden agenda"...
|
April 25, 2010
I am a concerned citizen and also a teacher. I think our district has finally moved forward and I want to see that continue. I don’t want to see us slide back into the past, so I am hoping that everyone will vote for those who are looking toward the future of our children. We really do not need anyone from a past administration who has a hidden agenda and old ideas that didn't work back then. Hopefully, when the dust clears on election day, we will have Aiken, McInnis, Easterling, and Ormsby on the Richmond County Board of Education.
Weather
Sponsored By:

Lottery
Sponsored By:

Stocks
Sponsored By:

Gas Prices
Sponsored By:

Featured Businesses
Recipes
Sponsored By: