Fatcow Icon
Sex offender visited school
by Philip D. Brown
2 years ago | 2304 views | 5 5 comments | 21 21 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Richmond County Schools officials confirmed they were unaware a man who visited the campus of Rohanen Middle School last month to solicit donations from students and faculty is registered as a sex offender in South Carolina.

A sex offender coming onto school grounds without notifying officials of his status is also a violation of state law.

The offender, David Waters, is a co-founder of Water’s Edge Ministries. He visited Rohanen to share his experiences working as a missionary in the West African nation of Ghana. The program was featured in Friday’s Daily Journal.

His wife, Anita Tarlton, is a recently retired Richmond Senior High teacher who is also a co-founder of the ministry.

Rohanen teachers said she accompanied Waters when he spoke with the children on Nov. 18, then she returned on the following day to speak with students.

On the 19th, she was accompanied by a man who identified himself as Sam Yates, and a representative of the Daily Journal was present to write an article about the visit.

Waters and Tarlton solicited contributions for a fund to purchase water filtration systems to be used in Ghana from the students and teachers during the visits.

A handout given to the students by Waters showed the inner-workings of a water filtration system, and gave a price of $2,500 for the device.

In a statement Tuesday, the schools said Waters will no longer be allowed on school grounds in the county.

The statement explained Tarlton was invited to speak to the seventh grade on both Thursday and Friday of the week, and Waters accompanied her during the Thursday visit.

“It has come to the attention of RCS that Waters is a registered sex offender in South Carolina,” the statement reads.

The statement said Tarlton was invited to speak after teachers learned of her missionary work in Africa.

“Student groups listened to the presentation in the media center, and several teachers were with them during the presentation,” it reads.

“We take great care in making sure that individuals who come to volunteer in our schools are not with children unsupervised,” RCS Superintendent Dr. George Norris said. “Our principal confirmed that Waters spoke to the students in a large group and was at no point was alone with students during his visit.”

RCS Public Information Officer Ashley Simmons confirmed Norris and Rohanen Middle Principal Pam Francisco decided school employees and students would not be allowed to participate in fundraising activities for the ministry.

“The project has been taken off the table,” she said.

RCS policy only allows students, voters or parents or guardians of students who are required to register as a sex offender to be allowed on school grounds.

Even then, each visit must be authorized by the principal of the school and supervised by school personnel.

School officials said they were not notified of Water’s status as a registered sex offender before his visit.

“It is unfortunate he didn’t realize his coming on campus was a violation of our policy,” Simmons said. “Our policy is in conjunction with state law and state board of education policy.”

Waters is now registered as a sex offender in the state of South Carolina, and has a given address in Winnsboro, located in Fairfield County. Simmons said that excludes him from the background search the schools use.

“Even if his name had been submitted for a criminal background check, he is an out-of-state offender, meaning he’s not registered in North Carolina, so his name wouldn’t come up in a North Carolina criminal background check,” Simmons said.

She called the circumstance a statewide issue that particularly effects counties that border another state.

“This is a challenge that needs to be addressed statewide,” Simmons said Tuesday. “We actually entered his name, and because he is not registered in the state of North Carolina, there were no results.”

Simmons said the schools employ background checks on those who volunteer with the school system.

“We do criminal background checks on people who are submitting themselves as volunteers, meaning they will have a regular presence in the schools, but we don’t do background checks on every person who enters a school building,” Simmons said.

She also said the schools maintain background checks on all retired teachers who make on-campus visits.

“The principal and the teachers of Rohanen assured us that not only in his case, but with all people, a teacher or school employee is with them at all times,” Simmons said. “Anyone who is outside of our school system must be supervised when working with children, and this is non-negotiable.”

She said officials commended Rohanen Middle faculty for making sure there was supervision in this case.

When asked about his criminal record, Waters confirmed the individual on the registry was indeed him, and pointed out the offense happened in 1992.

“This is something that happened 18 years ago,” he said, calling the registration “a scarlet letter” he must wear for the rest of his life.

He said the state of South Carolina requires that he register as a sex offender twice a year, and twice a year authorities verify his address.

“Other than that, I am free to live my life without restraints,” Waters said.

Waters said his charges were related to a “skinny-dipping” incident, and the victims were 50 to 100 feet away from him at the time.

“I’ve written a book about this that is available on our ministry’s Web site, and it is called ‘Sowing and Reaping A Fearless Heart: Convicted But Not Condemned,’” Waters said.

The book is available on the Web site www.weministry.com.

Palm Beach County Clerk of Court and Comptroller Office Communications Specialist Joseph Abreu confirmed Waters faced five charges in criminal felony court in 1992.

These five charges consisted of “three counts of lewd assault, one count of attempted sexual battery and one count of indecent exposure,” Abreu said.

The counts of attempted sexual battery and indecent exposure were filed, but never prosecuted.

As for the three counts of lewd and lascivious activity with a child under the age of 16 years old, Abreu said adjudication was withheld in those cases, meaning he wasn’t convicted of the offenses, pending a probation sentence.

In 1999, however, Waters was found to be in violation of his probation by the Florida court, and received three concurrent five and a half year sentences for the lewd and lascivious activity charges.

Abreu said the circumstances of the probation violation were unavailable.

Florida has four definitions of lewd and lascivious activity with a child. The first definition includes “handles, fondles or assaults any child under the age of 16 years in a lewd, lascivious or indecent manner.”

The second definition is “commits actual or simulated sexual intercourse, deviate sexual intercourse, sexual bestiality, masturbation, sadomasochistic abuse, actual lewd exhibition of the genitals or any act or conduct which simulates that sexual battery is being or will be committed upon any child under the age of 16 years or forces or entices the child to commit any such act.”

The third definition is “commits an act defined as sexual battery ... upon any child under the age of 16 years,” and the final definition is “knowingly commits any lewd or lascivious act in the presence of any child under the age of 16 years, without committing the crime of sexual battery, commits a felony of the second degree ...”

Waters’ version of events indicates the fourth definition would apply in his case.

Water’s Florida Inmate Release records show he was sentenced on August 19, 1999 for the three offenses, and received three concurrent five and a half year prison sentences.

He was taken into the custody of the state of Florida on Nov. 1, 1999, and released on Aug. 1, 2001.

He is currently categorized by the state of Florida as “released - required to register,” which means he is no longer under any form of confinement, supervision or any other court sanction, but is required to register with local authorities when he moves to a new address.

North Carolina General Statute, however, appears to forbid sex offenders from visiting schools, however, except for under certain circumstances.

According to The North Carolina Sex Offender and Public Protection Registration Programs, sex offenders are prohibited from going on “the premises of any place intended primarily for the use, care or supervision of minors, including, but not limited to, schools, children’s museums, child care centers, nurseries and playgrounds.”

They are also prohibited from going “within 300 feet of any location intended primarily for the use, care or supervision of minors when the place is located on premises that are not intended primarily for the use, care or supervision of minors, including, but not limited to, places described above in the preceding paragraph that are located in malls, shopping centers or other property open to the general public; and any place where minors gather for regularly scheduled educational, recreational or social programs.”

There apparently are exceptions to this rule if the offender is the parent or guardian of a minor, but even then written permission is required and the offender is obligated to notify school officials of their status as a registered sex offender.

Staff Writer Philip D. Brown can be reached at (910) 997-3111 ext. 32, or by e-mail at pbrown@yourdailyjournal.com.
Comments
(5)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
jukeboxhound
|
December 04, 2009
What law did this man break when he took off his clothes and went for a swim. Were there any kids that saw him? If there were kids that did see him then how can he be a sex offender by sight? I thought a sex offender had to actually touch or come into contact with a child to be an offender. I have been skinny dipping a lot of times. When i grew up that was just a thing we did as a dare. We didn't even care if anyone came up on us. Under water they couldn't see our naked body anyway. If this man had no contact with a child then it is wrong to lable him as a sex offender. Indecent exposure is all i see that could have been committed. I think there is a law against that. If there is a law against it then anyone that saw him naked was offended by sight not by touch. If you post sex offenders pictures on bulliten boards in every school you would be surprised to see who goes on school grounds every month that is on that post. You would be surprised to know who actually roams free right here in our county every day that is a sex offender.
teeismee
|
December 03, 2009
Heads up people! You don't go to prison for "skinny dipping". It was his choice to become a sexual offender- so don't give me that "Woe is me" stuff!

A police report should be filed by the school system for this incident, at the very least. He violated his conditions of Sexual Offender status and should be dealt with by the legal system.

And to the school system- check the national register for sexual offenders in the future. The Department of Justice has some great resources. Follow through a little better.

This is serious and Mr. Waters knew very well what he should or should not do. He lost his right to be around children on schoolgrounds.
justmyopinion9
|
December 02, 2009
...and one more thing...Waters' contention that he is "free to live his life without restraints" is not so accurate. As the reporter has stated it is unlawful for him to be on school grounds. The law is G.S. 14-208.18, Sex Offender Unlawfully on Premises and is a Class H Felony. It is his responsibility to know the laws and Dr. Norris' reposponsibility to ensure those laws are enforced on school property to adequately protect our children. It's not a "my bad" situation. It's a felony. Is the school board and Dr. Norris going to let this felony slide? If they do does that demonstrate neglect in the discharge of their duties? In that case are they themselves subject to G.S. 14-230, Willfully Failing to Discharge Duties, a Class 1 Misdemeanor? Sounds like a good follow-up story for the Daily Journal.
'Liza
|
December 02, 2009
I'm confused. Because a man had a skinny dipping incident over 18 years ago where he in no way touched a child - he is now branded for life by this one incident? I think that is the stupidest thing I have ever heard of. He and his wife are trying to do some good by doing missionary work in Africa. Obviously this man has turned his life around since that incident - if even that can be true. I myself have skinny dipped - but I am lucky enough not to have been branded for life by the label "sex offender".

That is just crazy. How many people are on the sex offender registry who don't really belong there? That's a story I'd like to see in your paper.
justmyopinion9
|
December 02, 2009
Sounds like a lame excuse from the central office via Simmons if you ask me. Who needs access to a criminal records check to verify if someone is a danger to the children? Sex offenders are most likely the reason for the need of a record check right? Try this Dr. Norris... www.nsopw.gov What? A website for registered sex offenders? Guess that could be useful for anyone with a computer and access to the internet and it's instant. Took every bit of a minute to locate him. Sloppy work by the school system if you ask me.
Weather
Sponsored By:

Lottery
Sponsored By:

Stocks
Sponsored By:

Gas Prices
Sponsored By:

Featured Businesses
Recipes
Sponsored By: